ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Survey of public health education combined with intelligent prescription intervention system on antibiotic use in the county-level hospitals.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the combined effectiveness of an antibiotic health literacy intervention and a prescription pre-audit intelligent decision system on antibiotic utilization. Thereby providing a reference basis for conducting antibiotic health literacy intervention activities and promoting rational drug use in similar hospitals. Methods: Evidence-based popular science materials, including handbooks, videos, and lectures, were developed as part of a combined intervention that integrated antibiotic education with a prescription pre-audit intelligent decision system. Variations in irrational antibiotic administration, antibiotic use density, and drug cost ratio were compared between the pre-intervention and post-intervention stages. A retrospective analysis was also conducted to summarize the classification and severity of respiratory ward medication events and the compliance of prescriptions recorded in the system from October to December 2025. Results: Multiple forms of health literacy intervention materials concerning rational antimicrobial administration were designed in this research, covering printed leaflets, WeChat posts, promotional videos and face-to-face training sessions. Educational interventions combining online and offline modes were associated with reductions in departmental antibiotic use density and the proportion of antibiotic expenditure relative to total medication costs. Integrated with the prescription pre-audit intelligent decision system, prescription-related risks derived from irrational medication orders were stratified into distinct severity grades in light of clinical realities of the ward. From October to December 2025, the counts of prescriptions with defects in treatment indications, dosing schedules, delivery routes and contraindication violations all declined relative to the baseline period of October to December 2024. Conclusion: This study observed that the multifaceted intervention, including interactive antimicrobial stewardship training for frontline clinicians and nurses, real-time patient-centered health education, and the prescription pre-audit intelligent decision system, has considerable potential to cut antimicrobial consumption. Upgrading health literacy intervention by integrating big data, artificial intelligence and other technologies and extending such comprehensive strategies to the entire hospital represents a promising approach for future implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.