ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Optimism and work-life balance in relation to infertility self-efficacy in IVF couples: a dyadic approach.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Infertility treatment is a prolonged medical and psychosocial stressor, and infertility self-efficacy reflects individuals' perceived capacity to cope with treatment demands. Research has rarely examined how personal and work-nonwork resources are jointly associated with infertility-specific coping beliefs within couples. Drawing on Conservation of Resources theory, this study examined personal optimism (PO), perceived work-life balance (WLB), and infertility self-efficacy (ISE) among women undergoing Methods: The analysis included 44 employed heterosexual couples ( Results: Among women, PO and WLB were each positively associated with ISE. However, PO was not significantly associated with WLB, and the indirect association between PO and ISE through WLB was not statistically significant. Among men, PO was positively associated with WLB, and both PO and WLB were positively associated with ISE. In addition, a significant positive indirect association between PO and ISE through WLB was observed among men. A direct dyadic contrast showed a stronger PO-WLB association among men than among women, although the confidence interval narrowly excluded zero. However, the direct comparison of the partner-specific indirect associations did not indicate a statistically significant difference between women and men. Conclusion: PO and WLB were independently associated with ISE in both partners. Among men, but not women, a significant indirect association between PO and ISE through WLB was observed, although the direct comparison of the partner-specific indirect associations was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that psychosocial care during IVF may benefit from attention to ISE, PO, and WLB. Longitudinal and intervention research is needed before clinical recommendations can be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.