ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Multi-agent game theory for precision psychiatry.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Psychiatry has learned to measure and map the brain in exquisite detail, yet it still lacks a theory of what happens between minds. Most current frameworks treat cognition as an individual process, studied through static and non-interactive tasks, creating a fundamental mismatch with real-world social behavior, which is dynamic and reciprocal. In restricted psychiatric conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia with social phenotypes, core symptoms emerge most clearly during interaction. Here I argue that these differences are better understood as failures of coordination between agents rather than solely deficits within individuals, and further make forward-looking computational predictions based on a game-theoretical perspective. Multi-agent game theory (MAGT) provides a conceptual yet principled framework to model such interactions, capturing how beliefs, strategies, and learning evolve through exchange. This perspective reframes psychiatric disorders involving interactional phenotypes as emergent properties of interacting systems and opens new avenues for mechanistic understanding and intervention. I also discuss the limitations and challenges of this new computational framework as applied to precision psychiatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.