Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876712›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Multi-agent game theory for precision psychiatry.

Zhe Sage Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zhe Sage ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

Thalamocortical cognitive networks in the healthy human brainP50MH132642 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Zhe Sage Chen · 2023 to 2026
$15.7M
CRCNS: Dissection and control of cognitive thalamocortical dynamicsR01MH139352 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Zhe Sage Chen, Michael M Halassa · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
Dissection of spatiotemporal activity from large-scale, multi-modal, multi-resolution hippocampal-neocortical recordings.RF1DA056394 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BUZSAKI, GYORGY, CHEN, ZHE SAGE · 2022 to 2022
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA056394NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH132642NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH139352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatry has learned to measure and map the brain in exquisite detail, yet it still lacks a theory of what happens between minds. Most current frameworks treat cognition as an individual process, studied through static and non-interactive tasks, creating a fundamental mismatch with real-world social behavior, which is dynamic and reciprocal. In restricted psychiatric conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia with social phenotypes, core symptoms emerge most clearly during interaction. Here I argue that these differences are better understood as failures of coordination between agents rather than solely deficits within individuals, and further make forward-looking computational predictions based on a game-theoretical perspective. Multi-agent game theory (MAGT) provides a conceptual yet principled framework to model such interactions, capturing how beliefs, strategies, and learning evolve through exchange. This perspective reframes psychiatric disorders involving interactional phenotypes as emergent properties of interacting systems and opens new avenues for mechanistic understanding and intervention. I also discuss the limitations and challenges of this new computational framework as applied to precision psychiatry.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disordercomputational phenotypegame theoryprecision psychiatryschizophreniasocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID42876712
PMCPMC13661910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.