ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Ignoring a noisy metronome during dyadic drumming.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigated how the tonal and rhythmic properties of a "noisy metronome" and the opportunity for visual contact would affect drumming partners' abilities to synchronize with each other. Method: Participants' task was to drum a regular beat in synchrony with their partner at a prescribed tempo. They heard a metronome while drumming that they were instructed to ignore. We manipulated the noise profile of the metronome so that it contained long-range autocorrelations, short-range autocorrelations, or white noise. We also manipulated its pitch so that it formed a consonant or dissonant chord alongside the participants' drum tones. We assessed the effect of this noisy metronome on participants' synchronization stability, tempo, and body motion. Results: Our findings showed that the noisy metronome impaired synchronization between partners but improved tempo-keeping. Manipulations of the metronome's rhythmic and tonal properties had no effect on any of the outcome variables. The noisy metronome prompted increased head and hand motion from the participants (measured in terms of motion speed); head motion was also greater among active musicians than inactive/nonmusicians, and hand motion was greater among partners who knew each other. Visual contact improved synchronization and participants moved their drumming hand more when they could see each other than when they could not. Discussion: Our findings have implications for our understanding of how people process and respond to competing rhythms and the strategies they use to (co-)regulate the timing of their movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.