Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876683›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Ignoring a noisy metronome during dyadic drumming.

Laura Bishop, Dongho Kwak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura BishopRITMO Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time and Motion, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Dongho KwakRITMO Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time and Motion, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigated how the tonal and rhythmic properties of a "noisy metronome" and the opportunity for visual contact would affect drumming partners' abilities to synchronize with each other. Method: Participants' task was to drum a regular beat in synchrony with their partner at a prescribed tempo. They heard a metronome while drumming that they were instructed to ignore. We manipulated the noise profile of the metronome so that it contained long-range autocorrelations, short-range autocorrelations, or white noise. We also manipulated its pitch so that it formed a consonant or dissonant chord alongside the participants' drum tones. We assessed the effect of this noisy metronome on participants' synchronization stability, tempo, and body motion. Results: Our findings showed that the noisy metronome impaired synchronization between partners but improved tempo-keeping. Manipulations of the metronome's rhythmic and tonal properties had no effect on any of the outcome variables. The noisy metronome prompted increased head and hand motion from the participants (measured in terms of motion speed); head motion was also greater among active musicians than inactive/nonmusicians, and hand motion was greater among partners who knew each other. Visual contact improved synchronization and participants moved their drumming hand more when they could see each other than when they could not. Discussion: Our findings have implications for our understanding of how people process and respond to competing rhythms and the strategies they use to (co-)regulate the timing of their movements.

Indexed as

attentionbody motioncoordinationexpertisejoint actionsensorimotor synchronization

Identifiers

PMID42876683
PMCPMC13661393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.