Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876682›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2026

CLSP-REQA: a real-time quality-aware closed-loop seizure prediction framework with Mamba-BiLSTM and confidence-gated intervention.

Mufeng Chen, Qi Wu, Bingchao Huang, Xiwen Lai, Zekai Chen, Xinge Ouyang, Quansheng Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mufeng ChenDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Qi WuMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Bingchao HuangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Xiwen LaiAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zekai ChenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Xinge OuyangCollege of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Quansheng RenSchool of Electronics, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Reliable seizure prediction is a prerequisite for closed-loop neurostimulation therapy, yet existing methods rarely account for the variability in EEG signal quality encountered in real-world deployment, and the overwhelming majority adopt non-strict evaluation protocols that overestimate generalization performance. Methods: We propose CLSP-REQA (Closed-Loop Seizure Prediction with Real-time EEG Quality Assessment), a unified framework that embeds a lightweight signal quality estimator directly within the prediction pipeline. A Real-time EEG Quality Assessment (REQA) module runs in parallel with a Mamba-BiLSTM backbone, producing a scalar quality score Results: On CHB-MIT, CLSP-REQA achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.7426 ± 0.0199, exceeding the unadapted cross-patient baseline of 0.69 reported by Jemal et al., using only 16 EEG channels compared to 23 in prior work, and without requiring any target-patient data or domain adaptation. On SIENA, CLSP-REQA achieved an AUC of 0.7012 ± 0.0249, exceeding the best domain-adapted cross-patient result of 0.61 on the same dataset under a strictly harder information constraint, since domain adaptation methods are given access to unlabelled target-patient data that CLSP-REQA does not use. Discussion: The framework outputs a structured four-tuple 〈

Indexed as

bidirectional LSTMclosed-loop neurostimulationconfidence calibrationcross-patient generalizationEEG signal quality assessmentepileptic seizure predictionMamba

Identifiers

PMID42876682
PMCPMC13661927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.