Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876665›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Interocular symmetry of retinal and choroidal OCT parameters in precapillary pulmonary hypertension: a brief research report.

Diana A Dmuchowska, Katarzyna Ptaszyńska, Joanna Konopińska, Karol Kamiński

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diana A DmuchowskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Katarzyna PtaszyńskaDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Joanna KonopińskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Karol KamińskiDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess interocular symmetry of retinal and choroidal optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived parameters in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) and healthy controls, and to evaluate the implications of symmetry for oculomics-based biomarker development. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 29 patients with precapillary PH and 37 age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent standardized spectral-domain OCT. Retinal and choroidal thicknesses, volumes and binarized choroidal biomarkers were quantified using validated protocols. Interocular agreement was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Spearman's rank correlation ( Results: Median interocular agreement was good but parameter-specific (ICC 0.76 in precapillary PH and 0.78 in controls). In PH, agreement was highest for choroidal metrics. In controls, it was lowest for retinal pigment epithelium thickness. No systematic laterality bias was detected in PH, whereas two parameters remained significant in controls. Absolute inter-eye differences were small but greater in PH for selected temporal and nasal retinal thickness and volume subfields. Conclusions: Interocular agreement was parameter-specific in both groups. In precapillary PH, one-eye sampling appears most defensible for choroidal biomarkers. Selected retinal parameters showed poor agreement, or greater absolute differences in precapillary PH than in controls, and require individual validation.

Indexed as

choroidchoroidal vascularity indexinterocular symmetryoculomicsoptical coherence tomographypulmonary hypertensionretina

Identifiers

PMID42876665
PMCPMC13661351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.