ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Interocular symmetry of retinal and choroidal OCT parameters in precapillary pulmonary hypertension: a brief research report.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess interocular symmetry of retinal and choroidal optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived parameters in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) and healthy controls, and to evaluate the implications of symmetry for oculomics-based biomarker development. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 29 patients with precapillary PH and 37 age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent standardized spectral-domain OCT. Retinal and choroidal thicknesses, volumes and binarized choroidal biomarkers were quantified using validated protocols. Interocular agreement was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Spearman's rank correlation ( Results: Median interocular agreement was good but parameter-specific (ICC 0.76 in precapillary PH and 0.78 in controls). In PH, agreement was highest for choroidal metrics. In controls, it was lowest for retinal pigment epithelium thickness. No systematic laterality bias was detected in PH, whereas two parameters remained significant in controls. Absolute inter-eye differences were small but greater in PH for selected temporal and nasal retinal thickness and volume subfields. Conclusions: Interocular agreement was parameter-specific in both groups. In precapillary PH, one-eye sampling appears most defensible for choroidal biomarkers. Selected retinal parameters showed poor agreement, or greater absolute differences in precapillary PH than in controls, and require individual validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.