ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Saudi specialty certificate in endodontics: program directors perceptions of candidate selection.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Program Directors (PDs) evaluate a range of factors when selecting candidates. Understanding their perspectives may help applicants better prepare for the selection process. This study explored PDs' perspectives on selection criteria for the Saudi Specialty Certificate in Endodontics (SSE) program and examined whether these perspectives differed according to gender, experience, hospital setting, and geographic region. Methods: This study aimed at an attempted census of all identifiable current and former SSE PDs registered with SCFHS. A previously validated survey with 30 questions covering seven domains: GPA, Exams, Research, Services and Electives, Interview, Recommendations, and Miscellaneous was distributed to the PDs via the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) platform to ensure anonymity. Data collection spanned four months. Descriptive statistics, along with independent sample t-test and ANOVA, were used for analysis. Results: 32 PDs responded, yielding a response rate of 55.17%. Most PDs were current (53.1%), male (81.2%), from the central region (50%), affiliated with the Ministry of Health (34.4%), and had over three years of experience (43.8%). PDs prioritized the services and electives (mean 4.04 ± 0.87) and recommendations (mean 3.97 ± 0.60) domains. Key factors influencing these preferences included clinical competency and staff reputation (mean 4.37 ± 0.87), participation in endodontic electives (mean 4.28 ± 0.81), service residency experience (mean 4.28 ± 0.88), and professional attire (mean 4.28 ± 0.85), among others. Exams (mean 3.31 ± 1.02) and research (mean 3.40 ± 0.98) were less prioritized, mainly due to low emphasis on publication output (mean 2.96 ± 1.44). Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences across most subgroup comparisons. An exploratory difference was observed in the recommendation domain according to hospital setting ( Conclusion: The PDs' reported priorities indicate that services and electives have the highest descriptive mean, with candidates' reputation and performance during that period being the most significant factors. Although opinions differed across hospital settings, the findings should be interpreted cautiously and considered exploratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.