ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Machine learning classification techniques for smart agriculture: a review of disease detection and crop recommendation.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) and Machine Learning (ML) in agriculture presents a revolutionary step toward efficient agricultural practices using data to address global issues surrounding food security. This review conducted a systematic search of the Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink databases for articles published between January 2023 and January 2026. It used keyword combinations like "IoT and machine learning and agriculture", "crop recommendation", "plant disease detection", and "precision farming". From the initial pool of articles found, 30 articles met the criteria for empirical methodology, quantitative performance reporting, and clear dataset descriptions. These were chosen for detailed analysis. It was discovered that the ensemble, as well as the traditional machine learning methods, such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Decision Trees, produce highly accurate predictions of the crop yields with an accuracy of 99.9%. Meanwhile, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and ResNet-based deep learning models detect diseases with an accuracy above 98% while Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) time-series models provide forecasts of weather conditions with an accuracy ranging from 94 to 98%, due to the complex nature of the environment dynamics. The application of IoT systems for precision agriculture produced a significant improvement in terms of resource utilization, resulting in 60-96% of water savings, 25% increased yield, and 36-38% reduced herbicide use. Although these advancements have been made, wider application is still hindered by high costs of implementation, lack of technological skills among farmers, data privacy concerns, issues of scalability within different agricultural settings, and consistent internet connection in rural areas. The current paper evaluates the use of IoT and ML in the agriculture sector from diverse data sources and studies to reveal the immense benefits offered by the two systems in enhancing farming activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.