ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Effect of low-intensity blood flow restriction combined with high-intensity resistance training on lower limb strength and stroke effect of table tennis players.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of different strength training protocols on lower limb strength and stroke effect in table tennis players. A single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) design was employed. A total of 30 table tennis players were recruited and randomly assigned into three groups: the low-intensity blood flow restriction training (LI-BFRT) group, high-intensity resistance training (HI-RT) group, and combined training (CB-RT) group. All participants completed an 8-week strength training intervention with three sessions per week. Key indicators including knee peak torque, squat jump (SJ) height, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, peak rate of force development (PRFD), and stroke effect were measured before and after the intervention. No significant differences in all baseline indicators were observed among the three groups (p > 0.05). After the intervention, the CB-RT group exhibited extremely significant improvements in knee flexion and extension peak torques, SJ and CMJ heights, PRFD, and stroke effect (p < 0.01). In the LI-BFRT group, left knee extension PT was extremely significantly improved (p < 0.01); Meanwhile SJ height, PRFD, and forehand topspin loop effect were all significantly enhanced (p < 0.05). In the HI-RT group, left knee extension PT was extremely significantly increased (p < 0.01); Meanwhile, left knee flexion PT, right knee flexion and extension peak torques, CMJ height, PRFD, and forehand backspin loop effect were all significantly improved (p < 0.05). The results indicate that compared with single LI-BFRT or HI-RT, CB-RT exhibited a greater improvement trend in lower limb strength and stroke effect among table tennis players.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.