ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Muscle amnesia: a hypothesized framework for motor-pattern accessibility in exercise rehabilitation after inactivity, injury and illness.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After inactivity, injury or illness, people may regain part of their strength, range of motion or load tolerance before they recover fluent movement. Clinicians may observe an athlete, patient or older adult who can generate force but returns to walking, squatting, standing, running or sport with a guarded, variable or inefficient movement strategy that appears disproportionate to remaining impairment. This Perspective presents a theoretical framework and proposes the term Muscle Amnesia as a cautious practical label for a history-, use- and context-sensitive reduction in access to a previously acquired task solution. The term is not intended to imply literal memory loss within muscle tissue, to replace established concepts or to create a new diagnosis. Rather, it names a candidate clinical-behavioural construct in which altered exposure, compensatory practice, pain, threat, fatigue, context change and reduced task practice may shift motor-pattern selection. The aim of this article is to define the construct, distinguish it from detraining, learned non-use, pain-adapted movement, skill decay and maladaptive compensation, and propose preliminary candidate criteria and research designs. We argue that exercise rehabilitation should examine not only physical capacity, but also whether capacity is organized into task-relevant movement. The framework remains hypothetical and requires qualitative, experimental and clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.