Trial reportFrontiers in oncology2026
Clinical outcomes after reirradiation with dose painting of recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer.
Trial report in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02921581 (ReIrradiation With FDG-PET Guided Dose Painting for Recurrent and Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ReIrradiation With FDG-PET Guided Dose Painting for Recurrent and Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer (rsHNC) presents a radiotherapeutic challenge due to limited tolerance of previously irradiated tissues. These patients could benefit from dose painting (DP), which focuses on delivering maximal dose to areas of high tumor burden while respecting dose constraints to organs at risk. In this study, we compare clinical outcomes in one group receiving standard reirradiation with a group receiving 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT-guided DP. Methods: Our standard reirradiation regimen is hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) of 1.5 Gy x 40 (60 Gy total dose). For DP, we defined two FDG-based prescription volumes receiving at least 65 Gy and 70 Gy. Thirteen patients receiving standard RT were compared with 10 DP patients. Toxicity was scored using CTCAE v3.0. Disease-related endpoints were locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The mean composite toxicity score was maximal at the end of RT, with varying patterns across the CTCAE items. No significant difference in toxicity was found between the groups except for dysphagia at 6 months, where the standard RT group had worse scores (p=0.01). No differences were found in LRC and DFS. Two-year OS was 50% in the DP group versus 15% in the standard group (p=0.04), although this may reflect higher comorbidity in the standard group. Conclusion: DP of rsHNC did not increase toxicity compared with standard reirradiation. No evidence of improved disease control was found. However, DP may benefit selected patients, and future studies should focus on identifying these candidates. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02921581.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.