ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Personalized anticoagulant therapy in venous thromboembolism: current role of direct oral anticoagulants, unmet clinical needs, and future perspectives on Factor XI inhibition.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has transformed the management of VTE by providing effective and convenient alternatives to vitamin K antagonists. However, despite their favorable efficacy-safety profile, clinically relevant bleeding, treatment individualization, and the management of patients with competing thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks remain important unmet clinical needs. Contemporary VTE management increasingly requires a personalized approach integrating clinical characteristics, comorbidities, biomarkers, and real-world evidence to optimize anticoagulant selection, treatment intensity, and duration. Large prospective registries have expanded our understanding of VTE across heterogeneous clinical settings, including cancer-associated thrombosis, postoperative VTE, incidental and subsegmental pulmonary embolism, and other high-risk populations frequently underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. In parallel, emerging prognostic tools, including D-dimer, hemoglobin, inflammatory indices, lipid-related biomarkers, and machine-learning-based prediction models, are contributing to a more refined assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risk. These emerging therapies are being evaluated as potential strategies to reduce bleeding while maintaining antithrombotic efficacy; however, recent phase III findings have demonstrated heterogeneous efficacy across clinical indications, emphasizing that their future role is likely to be indication-specific. This narrative review examines the current role of DOACs in VTE management, discusses the clinical and biological determinants of individualized anticoagulant therapy, and critically appraises the evolving and heterogeneous evidence for Factor XI inhibition as a potential future anticoagulant strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.