Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876543›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Physiological response strategies of pioneer endemic species

Chi Zhang, Haitao Wang, Yongcui Wang, Yu Qiu, Lei Chu, Jianqiang Qian, Quanlai Zhou, Alamusa, Lian Jia, Lixin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chi ZhangCAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China.
Haitao WangCAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China.
Yongcui WangCAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China.
Yu QiuState Key Laboratory of Efficient Production of Forest Resources, Key Laboratory of Forest Cultivation and Management of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
Lei ChuTai'an County Jiuguhe Agricultural Development Co., LTD, Anshan, Liaoning, China.
Jianqiang QianCollege of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Quanlai ZhouCAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China.
AlamusaCAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China.
Lian JiaCollege of Chemistry and Life Science, Anshan Normal University, Anshan, Liaoning, China.
Lixin WangDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Wind erosion and sand burial are recurrent but physically distinct aeolian disturbances in semi-arid dune systems. We investigated how Methods: Seedlings were subjected to five simulated wind-erosion levels (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 cm) and five sand-burial levels (0, 1.7, 3.3, 5.0, and 6.7 cm). Chlorophyll, proline, soluble sugar, malondialdehyde (MDA), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were quantified. Treatment effects were evaluated using two-way ANOVA, PCA of standardized variables, disturbance-specific Spearman correlations, and an exploratory path analysis. Results: Disturbance type, relative disturbance level, and their interaction affected all six physiological traits, and PCA separated the two-treatment series in multivariate space. Under sand burial, chlorophyll, proline, and soluble sugar showed positive within-treatment covariation after Spearman correlations. Under simulated wind erosion, POD and SOD covaried positively, whereas MDA was not significantly correlated with either antioxidant enzyme; chlorophyll-proline and soluble sugar-MDA associations also remained significant after correction. The exploratory path model had limited overall fit and was used only to summarize statistical associations, not to establish causal physiological mechanisms. Discussion: Under the controlled conditions of this seedling experiment, the two isolated treatments were associated with different physiological response and covariation patterns. These results provide testable hypotheses about disturbance-specific seedling responses rather than evidence of switchable association, population-level persistence, or restoration performance. Validation is required under field conditions, across additional life stages, and with pulsed and combined erosion-burial events.

Indexed as

antioxidative defenseArtemisia wudanicaosmotic adjustmentphysiological strategysand burialwind erosion

Identifiers

PMID42876543
PMCPMC13661353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.