Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876537›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Inequality atop excess: a nonlinear decomposition of wealth-related inequality in caesarean section delivery in Punjab, Pakistan.

Muhammad Nadeem, Shahid Adil, Adel Bashatah, Mohamed N Al Arifi, Wajid Syed, Ayesha Iqbal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad NadeemDepartment of Economics, Division of Management and Administrative Sciences, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
Shahid AdilPunjab Resource Improvement and Digital Effectiveness (PRIDE) Project, Planning and Development Board, Government of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Adel BashatahDepartment of Nursing Administration and Education, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed N Al ArifiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Wajid SyedDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ayesha IqbalDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Caesarean section (CS) rates are rising rapidly across South Asia, and Pakistan combines over-use among advantaged groups with historically limited access among the poor. Quantifying and decomposing wealth-related inequality in CS delivery is essential for equitable obstetric policy. Decomposed by the Wagstaff-van Doorslaer method; the rich-poor gap was decomposed using a two-fold nonlinear (Yun) Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition. All estimates applied survey weights with PSU-cluster-robust inference; analyses used Python 3.12 (statsmodels 0.14). Because service-use variables lie on the causal pathway between wealth and CS, hierarchical models are reported and all decomposition results are descriptive, not causal. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 6,832 ever-married women with recorded last pregnancy delivery from the Punjab Health and Population Survey (PHPS) 2024-25 was done. The aim was to measure inequality by wealth in the rates of cesarean section (CS) delivery and identify the channels responsible for the inequality. The dependent variable CS delivery was binary, with the primary explanatory variable being a principal-component analysis (PCA) based household wealth index, with maternal, service use and clinical covariates. Inequality was measured using concentration curves, standard concentration index, Wagstaff-normalised concentration index, Erreygers concentration index and decomposed by Wagstaff-van Doorslaer method. The rich-poor gap was decomposed by a two-fold nonlinear (Yun) Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition. Survey weights were employed in all estimates, which were derived using PSU-cluster-robust inference; analyses were conducted in Python 3.12 (statsmodels 0.14). Because service-use variables lie on the causal pathway between wealth and CS, hierarchical models are reported and all decomposition results are descriptive, not causal. Results: The weighted CS rate was 43.3% (21.0% poorest to 64.6% richest quintile). CS delivery was concentrated among the wealthy (standard CI = 0.195, 95% CI 0.173-0.215; Erreygers = 0.337, 95% CI 0.301-0.373). In the fully adjusted model the richest quintile (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.50-2.85), private-facility delivery (OR 3.50, 2.90-4.23) and lady-doctor attendance (OR 13.10, 9.65-17.80) showed the strongest associations. There was no multicollinearity (all VIF < 2.45) and model discrimination was good (AUC 0.824). Excluding proximate service-use variables, observed characteristics accounted for 66.9% of the 28.4-percentage-point rich-poor gap; adding service use raised this to 87.3%, with lady-doctor attendance (44.7%) and private-facility delivery (20.9%) the largest components. Conclusion: Wealth-related inequality in caesarean delivery in Punjab is predominantly associated with differential access to private, physician-led obstetric care. These associations are descriptive and cannot establish causation. Policy should pair clinical audit of elective CS indications in the private sector with financial protection for medically necessary CS among poorer women.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionHealthcare DisparitiesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPakistanPregnancySocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adultcaesarean sectionconcentration indexmaternal health servicesOaxaca– Blinder decompositionPakistansocioeconomic inequality

Identifiers

PMID42876537
PMCPMC13661399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.