ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Psychosocial work experience and salutogenic health among nurses and physicians in a reorganized tertiary care hospital: differences and associations.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to analyse psychosocial work experience and salutogenic health among nurses and physicians in a reorganized tertiary care hospital in Lithuania. Material and methods: In 2025, an anonymous hard-copy survey was conducted in a large tertiary care hospital in Lithuania. Ethical approval was obtained from the local bioethics committee. In total 900 questionnaires were distributed to physicians and nurses with 497 returned (55.2% overall response), including different response rates by group (56.0% physicians vs. 54.6% nurses). Each participant completed a three-part questionnaire comprising the Work Experience Measurement Scale (WEMS) rated on a six-point Likert scale, the Salutogenic Health Indicator Scale (SHIS) and demographic questions (sex, age group <40/40-54/≥55, position, years employed in the hospital <4/4-10/>10, and other employment). Indices were standardized to 0-100, internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's alpha, group differences were tested using independent-samples t-tests, multiple linear regression was used to model SHIS as the dependent variable from the six WEMS sub-indices (adjusted for age), with all analyses performed in SPSS 19.0 at Results: The study results showed satisfactory to excellent reliability for the measures, with SHIS (12 semantic differential items on recent affective experiences such as alert-tired and happy-depressed) reaching high internal consistency (Cronbach's Conclusion: The study instruments showed satisfactory to excellent internal consistency, supporting the credibility of the subsequent comparisons and regression analyses. Nurses reported more favorable psychosocial work experiences and higher salutogenic health than physicians. Salutogenic health was positively associated with supportive working conditions, time experience, and the process of change among physicians, and with internal work experience, time experience, and the process of change among nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.