ArticleFrontiers in cognition2026
Brain mechanics and cognition: the role of rodent MR elastography in identifying cellular mechanisms.
Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) non-invasively quantifies brain tissue mechanical properties and has revealed an intriguing relationship between regional viscoelasticity and cognitive function across the lifespan. However, the biological basis of this relationship remains poorly understood as it is not yet clear which microstructural features generate the mechanical signal, whether brain mechanics are primarily structural or also dynamic on cognitive timescales, or how generalizable the current relationships observed in humans are across different brain regions and functions. We argue that resolving these questions requires preclinical MRE in rodents, where mechanical measurements can be linked directly to complementary analyses of cellular components and where structure and function can be experimentally perturbed. Although rodent MRE is well-established and has been productively applied to disease models, it has been little used in the contexts in which the human MRE-cognition findings are most concentrated including normal development and aging and cognitive variation in the otherwise-healthy brain. We review the human MRE-cognition literature, summarize what preclinical MRE has revealed to date, and outline experimental frameworks organized around the open questions through which rodent MRE could begin to clarify why brain mechanics relate to brain function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.