ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Associated factors and predictive modeling of deep vein thrombosis in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to identify factors associated with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and to develop predictive models to facilitate individualized risk assessment in this population. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 240 patients with stroke admitted to a rehabilitation department, including 63 patients with DVT and 177 without DVT. Baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables were collected. Univariate analysis was performed to screen variables potentially associated with DVT, followed by multivariable logistic regression to identify variables independently associated with DVT. In parallel, six machine-learning models were developed using all baseline variables. The full cohort was evaluated across 100 stratified 8:2 train-test splits, with repeated five-fold cross-validation performed within each training subset and corresponding held-out subsets used for testing. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to enhance interpretability. Results: Multivariable analysis identified lower Barthel Index [odds ratio (OR) = 0.979, Conclusion: In conclusion, our findings support the use of integrated predictive approaches for DVT risk assessment and targeted screening in stroke rehabilitation settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.