Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026
Strengthening Migrant Access to Reproductive Healthcare in Thailand: observation of fixed and outreach service-based models of antenatal care for Karen and Myanmar migrants in Thailand, 2021-2024.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Evidence to guide reproductive healthcare provision for undocumented migrants is limited. This study reports on the Strengthening Migrant Access to Reproductive Healthcare in Thailand (SMARH-T) initiative. Methods: This prospective observational study presents indicators of antenatal care (ANC), birth outcomes, and contraceptive uptake classified by the clinic of registration- standard (fixed clinic) or intervention (outreach clinic) -over a 3.5-year period from March 2021 to August 2024, including the initial 6-month pilot phase. Results: In total, 5,391 pregnant women (2,649 fixed and 2,742 outreach) registered over the 3.5 years, with the outreach team averaging 31 site visits per month. Seven of the nine WHO framework indicators for a positive pregnancy experience were reported for the two service-based models of antenatal care (ANC): the standard fixed clinic model and a new outreach model. Among women who delivered (2,280 fixed, 2,148 outreach), five of the seven indicators improved. The most improved measure by proportional increase from year one (baseline) to three, were eight ANC contacts (107.6% fixed, 81.7% outreach) and first ANC contact at <12 weeks (43.2% fixed, 31.0% outreach). First ANC contact at <12 weeks was the lowest-performing indicator overall (<30% of women). In contrast, syphilis screening, blood pressure monitoring, and fetal heartbeat measurement achieved >97.5% among all women. Homebirth without a skilled birth attendant was 2-fold higher in the outreach group (11.6% outreach, 5.3% fixed). Within 100 days of birth, 58.6% of women (1,945 of 3,318) opted for contraception; of these, the majority chose an implant (1,305 of 1,945, 67.1%), mostly (860 of 1,305, 65.9%) within 7 days postpartum. Completion of the 4-component delivery package (≥2 tetanus vaccinations, skilled birth attendance, health insurance and contraception within 100 days of birth) was achieved by 48.6% of women in total, with a greater proportional increase (year one to three) in the outreach group, including for health insurance. There were three maternal deaths (giving a maternal mortality ratio of 91 [95%CI: 31-267] per 100,000 live births [3 of 3,290]) and the maternal near-miss rate was 33 per 1,000 live births (95% CI: 28-40; 110 of 3,290), primarily due to postpartum hemorrhage. Conclusion: In total, five of seven quality indicators of care defined by the WHO framework for a positive pregnancy experience improved, with the outreach model of care nearly meeting the standards achieved by the fixed model. While the outreach model performed well, its sustainability remains a significant concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.