ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2026
Temporal dynamics between the whisker sensorimotor cortex and the olivocerebellar module in awake mice.
Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The precise timing of the long-range bidirectional connections between the cerebral cortex and the cerebellum remains a critical factor in elucidating their respective and integrated functions. The key role of the cerebellum in both motor and non-motor domains is exerted through numerous cerebro-cerebellar closed loops that sustain different forms of motor coordination, in which the response timing of the various types of cerebellar neurons may constitute a significant component of neural computation. Methods: In this study, we investigated the cerebral sensorimotor cortex and the corresponding cerebellar region (Crus I) of the murine whisker system during electrical stimulation of the whisker pad. In addition, the firing of Golgi cells, Purkinje cells (PC), deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) neurons, and inferior olive (IO) neurons was analyzed during electrical stimulation of the whisker pad (Wh), the somatosensory (wS1) and motor (wM1) cortices. Results: We demonstrated that, although peripheral Wh stimulation evoked cortical, cerebellar and IO responses at the same early latency (~3 ms), the transmission within the olivocerebellar circuit was slower when the signal was elicited by wS1 stimulation than by peripheral input, and even slower when wM1 was stimulated. Discussion: We discussed the different possibilities regarding the transmission of the efference copy and the forward dynamic model within these circuits, and we speculated that the relative slowing of wM1 input into the olivo-cerebellar circuit reflects the increased computational demand associated with the elaboration of the final motor command.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.