ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
A pilot-wellness-informed ecological framework for human-autonomy teaming in future fighter aviation.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Future fighter operations are expected to combine increasingly capable autonomy, collaborative aircraft, dense sensor information, and sustained physiological and cognitive demands. This Perspective proposes a pilot-wellness-informed ecological framework in which the pilot, a pilot-specific digital twin, an intelligent flight-management system, the aircraft, and external agents are treated as interdependent elements within a systems-of-systems framework. The framework does not replace situation awareness, distributed cognition, joint cognitive systems, adaptive automation, or human-autonomy teaming. Instead, it extends their unit of analysis by making the pilot's dynamic physiological and neurocognitive state, longitudinal variability, and health-related constraints explicit system variables and design objectives. The pilot digital twin is defined narrowly as an individualized state-estimation and forecasting capability, whereas the intelligent flight-management system integrates pilot, platform, mission, and environmental information to provide explainable recommendations and, where authorized, bounded adaptive action. We identify testable propositions concerning individualized prediction, adaptive support, shared situation awareness, trust calibration, and governance. The framework is prospective and requires validation in simulation, training, and operationally representative environments. Its purpose is to organize research toward systems that protect pilot agency, sustain performance, and preserve long-term health while exploiting increasingly autonomous teammates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.