Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876479›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus XELOX in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Huike Wang, Huijing Tan, Yuting Sun, Yanwei Su, Yihebali Chi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huike WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Huijing TanDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuting SunDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yanwei SuDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yihebali ChiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are highly vascularized malignancies for which effective treatment options remain limited in the unresectable locally advanced or metastatic setting. Although platinum-based chemotherapy has demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced NETs, evidence supporting its combination with antiangiogenic therapy remains insufficient. In this retrospective study, 85 patients with progressive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic well-differentiated NETs initiated bevacizumab plus XELOX, consisting of bevacizumab at 7.5 mg/kg and oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m² every 3 weeks, together with capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle. Among them, 72 patients who completed at least two treatment cycles and underwent post-baseline radiological evaluations comprised the safety set. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1, while secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Among the efficacy-evaluable patients, 62 (86.1%) received the regimen as second-line or later systemic therapy. Best responses included complete response (CR) in 1 patient (1.4%), partial response (PR) in 29 (40.3%), stable disease (SD) in 41 (56.9%), and progressive disease (PD) in 1 (1.4%), resulting in an ORR of 41.7% and a DCR of 98.6%. In a conservative sensitivity analysis encompassing all 85 treated patients-treating the 13 non-evaluable patients as non-responders-the ORR was 35.3%. After a median follow-up of 17.2 months, the median PFS was 20.9 months (95% CI, 13.7 months-not reached), with 6-, 12-, and 24-month PFS rates of 84.7%, 69.6%, and 47.3%, respectively. Median OS was not reached, and OS data remained immature. The most frequent any-grade adverse events (AEs) were elevated aspartate aminotransferase (48.6%), anemia (44.4%), lymphopenia and hypoalbuminemia (41.7% each), and hyperglycemia (40.3%), while neutropenia was the most frequent individual grade ≥3 AE (5.6%). No grade ≥3 bevacizumab-specific toxicities were observed. These findings suggest that bevacizumab plus XELOX demonstrates clinically meaningful antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in advanced NET patients. Given the retrospective and single-arm design, this regimen may represent a potential alternative or sequential treatment option when alkylating-agent-based chemotherapy is unsuitable, whereas prospective comparative studies are warranted to validate these findings and determine its optimal clinical role.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCapecitabineDeoxycytidineFluorouracilNeuroendocrine TumorsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisOxaloacetatesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBevacizumabCapecitabineDeoxycytidineFluorouracilOxaloacetatesantiangiogenic therapybevacizumabcapecitabineneuroendocrine tumorsoxaliplatinretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID42876479
PMCPMC13661408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.