ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026
Automated eye-tracking for Parkinson's disease diagnosis: a proof-of-concept cascade classifier study.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder of increasing prevalence, with diagnostic accuracy of approximately 26% in early symptomatic patients. There is a need for accurate, non-invasive biomarkers to aid in disease diagnosis. Methods: This proof-of-concept study enrolled 90 participants (PD Results: Level 1 achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.818 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.91), with a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 63%. Level 2 achieved an AUC of 0.670 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.80), with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 63%. As a proof-of-concept study, the observed performance positions the device as an adjunctive screening tool. Diagnostic discrimination can only be achieved through a much larger Phase III study. Five adverse events were recorded (three cases of dizziness, one of nausea, and one of dry eyes); one participant withdrew from the study. Conclusions: Preliminary evidence supports clinical validity pending confirmatory Phase III study: reproducible eye-tracking signal for PD is detectable using a two-level cascade classifier. A multi-center confirmatory study is warranted before assessment of clinical utility.Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.govNCT04925622.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.