ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Extratemporal Facial Nerve: Surgical Landmarks, Risk Zones, and a Practical Framework for Safe Dissection.
Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To provide a clinically relevant synthesis of the extratemporal facial nerve, focusing on anatomical variability, surgical landmarks, and regions at risk of injury. Method: A narrative review of the literature was performed, examining the extratemporal facial nerve across the parotid, midface, jawline, perioral, temporal, periorbital, and frontal regions. Emphasis was placed on branching patterns, depth relative to fascial planes, and surgically relevant anatomical relationships. Findings: The extratemporal facial nerve demonstrates considerable variability in course and branching. Regions where the nerve follows a superficial or less predictable trajectory represent areas of increased surgical risk. In contrast, consistent fascial planes and defined anatomical spaces may provide relatively safer corridors for dissection. Conclusion: A region-based, plane-oriented understanding of facial nerve anatomy reflects intraoperative conditions more closely than landmark-based descriptions alone. This approach may improve surgical orientation and reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury, particularly in procedures involving the parotid and midface. Level of Evidence: Level 5 (Narrative Review).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.