ArticleCureus2026
Anatomic Reconstruction of Acute Posterior Shoulder Instability With Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesions: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posterior shoulder dislocation associated with a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion is an uncommon injury that may result in persistent instability when the humeral head defect is engaged. Management depends on lesion size, engagement, chronicity, and reconstructibility; both non-anatomic procedures and anatomic reconstruction strategies have been described for acute lesions within the joint-preserving range. We present two cases of acute posterior shoulder instability with engaging reverse Hill-Sachs lesions treated with a combined arthroscopic-open approach. In both patients, arthroscopic posterior labral repair was followed by open disimpaction and graft-supported anatomic reconstruction of the humeral head through a deltopectoral approach with partial superior subscapularis tenotomy. In the first case, supplemental cannulated screw fixation (Raynham, MA: DePuy Synthes) was used because of a deeper defect, whereas in the second case graft support alone was sufficient after stable reduction was achieved. Immediate post-operative imaging demonstrated concentric reduction of the glenohumeral joint and restoration of humeral head contour in both patients. At a final follow-up of 24 months, neither patient had sustained recurrent instability or other symptoms, and neither required reoperation or other intervention. Active forward elevation was 160° in both patients, with external rotation at the side of 90° and 70° and internal rotation to T7 and T9, respectively. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 90 and 88, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores 95 and 93, and visual analog scale pain scores 0 of 10 in both patients. This report highlights a practical combined arthroscopic-open, joint-preserving strategy that addresses both the posterior capsulolabral lesion and the humeral head defect while allowing direct visualization of the impacted articular surface and fixation tailored to lesion morphology. In selected acute, engaging, and reconstructible reverse Hill-Sachs lesions, this approach may be technically feasible as a joint-preserving anatomic option; comparative studies are required before it can be positioned as an alternative to established non-anatomic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.