ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2026
Research and Outcome Priorities for the Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program in Ontario: A Community-Engaged Modified Delphi Study.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program (CPNP) is a federal initiative that addresses the critical impact of early nutrition and perinatal care on health outcomes by providing community-based perinatal health and nutrition services to socially and economically vulnerable women and their infants. Using a flexible, locally adaptable community programming model, the CPNP aims to improve the health of women and their babies by promoting healthy birth weights and supporting breastfeeding; fostering community partnerships; and providing culturally sensitive support. To identify priorities for future research and outcome measurement within the program's monitoring and evaluation framework, we engaged CPNP personnel from 26 sites across the province of Ontario as expert knowledge holders in a Modified Delphi study. Among participating sites, 57% were hosted within a community-based agency, 23% within an Indigenous-led agency, and 20% within a public health unit. Participants ranked priorities based on what they believed best reflected CPNP clients' needs, contributed to evidence-based program development, and aligned with the realities of community-based service delivery. All priorities were viewed as important for programming. From the relative rankings, two research topics were highest-ranked: assessing the impacts of the CPNP and conducting a needs assessment to identify community-defined perinatal health needs. Maternal mental health was the highest-ranked outcome measure, because of its perceived central role in supporting parent-infant health, well-being, and social connectedness. Collectively, these applied findings offer strategic direction to advance the CPNP's adaptive program delivery model, and demonstrate the methodological value of engaging community knowledge holders to inform perinatal program delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.