ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2026
Implementation Analysis of Mexico's Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly Initiative: 2016-2023.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation Analysis of Mexico's Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly Initiative: 2016-2023.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly (BBF) initiative is an evidence-based decision-making toolbox to support countries in assessing readiness and identifying policies needed to scale up breastfeeding (BF) protection, promotion, and support programs. Mexico has implemented BBF four times, providing an opportunity to examine how adaptations influenced the implementation processes and outcomes. This study aimed to document how BBF implementation evolved across four BBF implementation waves in Mexico (2016-2023), identify core functions and key adaptations, and examine perceived outcomes from Committee members' perspectives. A mixed-methods implementation analysis was conducted using BBF process records and qualitative data from interviews and questionnaires with BBF Committee members who had participated since earlier waves as well as those involved more recently. Adaptations were examined using the Model for Adaptation Design and Impact (MADI). Data were analyzed through thematic analysis and integrated using the SWOT framework. Multiple adaptations over time enhanced the operational efficiency of the BBF process without compromising its core functions. Key improvements included strengthened coordination structures, diversified funding, a shift to hybrid and virtual modalities, streamlined subcommittees, and expanded use of digital tools for data collection, coordination, and management. These adaptations improved BBF process coordination and transparency. Committee members reported increased intersectoral collaboration with key policy actors and uptake of BBF recommendations, while political transitions and limited advocacy follow-up were identified as shortcomings of the BBF process. The BBF process was successfully implemented in and adopted by Mexico. Context-sensitive adaptations identified over time strengthened the BBF implementation process while maintaining its core functions, offering lessons for sustaining breastfeeding policy decision-making in Mexico and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.