ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Automated linac downtime tracking across 4 radiation oncology clinics within a single hospital system utilizing statistical process control.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLinear accelerator (linac) downtime disrupts clinical workflow and may delay patient treatment; however, downtime events are frequently undocumented or recorded in informal reporting systems. Data-driven approaches using routinely collected operational metrics may improve downtime surveillance and provide insight into system-level adaptation. PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate if statistical process control (SPC) methods can be applied to routine treatment and scheduling data from an oncology information system (OIS) to identify linac downtime events and characterize operational response across multiple radiation oncology clinics within a single hospital system.
methodsDaily machine-level operational data from 10 linacs across 4 clinics were analyzed over 29 months (January 2024-May 2026). Machine metrics included daily patient volume, cancellations, and operating hours. For each machine, rolling 45-day baseline means and standard deviations were computed, and SPC rules (± 3σ control limits and > 10 cancellations / day) were applied to detect downtime days. SPC-flagged events were compared with email-based downtime event logs to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Downtime events were categorized by cause, and intra-hospital patient redistribution was assessed by identifying concurrent > 4σ volume increases on alternate machines.
resultsOver the 29-month study period, 138 downtime events were documented in downtime event logs. SPC identified 23 additional events exhibiting operational signatures consistent with downtime. Using reported events as the reference standard, SPC achieved sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.99, PPV 0.79, and NPV 0.99. Downtime frequently resulted in compensatory increases in patient volume on alternate machines, with 41 transfer pairs identified across three hospitals. When the reported downtime cause was specified, machine mechanical causes accounted for the largest proportion (48%) of downtime events.
conclusionsSPC applied to routinely collected operational data provides a scalable framework for automated linac downtime detection. Integration of automated monitoring with structured reporting may improve downtime surveillance and inform proactive operational planning in radiation oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.