Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876054›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

Development and validation of a pregnant phantom with adjustable fetal presentation for region-specific fetal radiation dose assessment during pelvic radiography.

Yuta Matsunaga, Yumi Kataoka, Koichi Chida, Yasuki Asada

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuta MatsunagaSchool of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2356-9385
Yumi KataokaSchool of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5503-6970
Koichi ChidaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0913-2777
Yasuki AsadaSchool of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9559-4811

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K10828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate assessment of fetal radiation dose during diagnostic X-ray examinations remains challenging because commercially available pregnancy phantoms do not adequately reproduce fetal anatomy or permit organ-specific dose measurements. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a pregnant phantom with adjustable fetal presentation and to evaluate its anatomical realism and applicability for fetal dose assessment during pelvic radiography.

methodsThe developed phantom comprised an anthropomorphic phantom, a whole-body fetal phantom, acrylic components, and water-filled plastic bags. The fetal phantom was fabricated using three-dimensional printing technology and incorporated bone-equivalent and soft-tissue-equivalent materials. Fetal presentations could be adjusted to cephalic or breech presentations by repositioning the fetal phantom within the abdominal phantom. Computed tomography (CT) images were acquired to measure CT numbers of the fetal brain, thorax, abdomen, pelvic bone, and surrounding water-filled regions. Absorbed doses were measured using real-time dosimeters placed at five locations in the fetal head and three locations in the fetal abdomen. Dose measurements were performed during pelvic radiography and compared with those obtained using a conventional homogeneous pregnancy phantom.

resultsThe mean CT numbers of the fetal brain, thorax, abdomen, pelvic bone, and water-filled regions were 2.1, -0.8, -0.4, 323.8, and 1.6 HU, respectively. These values were within the expected ranges for soft tissue and bone and were comparable to those of a conventional homogeneous phantom. During pelvic radiography, the mean absorbed doses measured using the adjustable fetal-presentation phantom were 1.34 mGy in the fetal head and 0.07 mGy in the fetal abdomen for the cephalic presentation, and 0.05 mGy and 1.67 mGy, respectively, for the breech presentation. In comparison, the mean absorbed dose measured in the fetal region of the conventional homogeneous phantom was 2.05 mGy. The findings demonstrated substantial differences in regional fetal dose distribution according to fetal presentation. In particular, the fetal head dose in the cephalic presentation was lower than that measured using the conventional phantom. This difference may be partly attributable to attenuation by the fetal skull; however, the comparison should be interpreted with caution given differences in phantom geometry, internal materials, and dosimeter locations between the two phantoms.

conclusionA novel pregnant phantom with adjustable fetal presentation was successfully developed. The phantom reproduced anatomically relevant structures using realistic bone-equivalent and soft-tissue-equivalent materials and enabled direct dose measurements in specific fetal anatomical regions. Compared with a conventional homogeneous phantom, the developed phantom provided a more detailed assessment of fetal dose distributions and allowed evaluation of the effects of fetal presentation on radiation exposure during pelvic radiography.

Indexed as

FetusPelvisPhantoms, ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedFemaleHumansPregnancyRadiation Dosagediagnostic imagingfetal dosemedical physicspelvic radiographypregnancy phantomradiation protection

Identifiers

PMID42876054
PMCPMC13669540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.