Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42875989›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish DESTEK (D-SCOPE) Questionnaire: A Multidimensional Assessment of Dietitians' Knowledge, Attitudes and Preparedness Regarding Dietary Supplements in Türkiye.

Ayşe Betül Bilen, Ayşenur Çalık, Pınar Ece Demiray, Kardelen Kandemir, Gülen Ecem Kalkan, Ömer Turan, Müveddet Emel Alphan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ayşe Betül BilenFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2765-2677
Ayşenur ÇalıkFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5823-617X
Pınar Ece DemirayFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3310-612X
Kardelen KandemirFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9632-9908
Gülen Ecem KalkanFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3397-9513
Ömer TuranFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4563-8816
Müveddet Emel AlphanFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9702-1881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe increasing use of dietary supplements in Türkiye underscores the need for validated instruments to assess dietitians' knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy regarding supplements. However, no validated Turkish tool is currently available. This study aimed to culturally adapt the Dietitians' Survey of Comfort, Opinions and Preparedness in Education in Supplements (-SCOPE) Questionnaire into Turkish (Diyetisyenlerin Eğitim, Supleman Tercihleri ve Konforu Anketi; DESTEK) and evaluate its psychometric properties.

methodsThis methodological study included 223 dietitians. Exploratory factor analysis (Principal Axis Factoring with Direct Oblimin rotation) was conducted to identify the underlying structure, followed by confirmatory factor analysis to test model fit. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Convergent validity was examined through composite reliability and average variance extracted, and discriminant validity was evaluated using the Fornell-Larcker criterion.

resultsA four-factor structure explaining 38.3% of total variance was identified. Sampling adequacy was acceptable (KMO = 0.78; Bartlett's test: χ

conclusionsThe findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the DESTEK scale for assessing Turkish dietitians' knowledge, attitudes and perceived preparedness regarding dietary supplements. Given its multidimensional structure, DESTEK may be useful for evaluating specific domains of supplement-related competence; however, further validation in larger and more diverse samples is recommended.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNutritionistsAdultCross-Cultural ComparisonFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeydietary supplementsdietitiansurveys and questionnairesvalidity and reliability

Identifiers

PMID42875989
PMCPMC13669518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.