Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42875961›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Coarsened Data in Small Area Estimation: A Bayesian Two-Part Model for Mapping Smoking Behavior.

Aldo Gardini, Lorenzo Mori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aldo GardiniDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2164-5815
Lorenzo MoriDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4152-9712

Funding

European Union - NextGenerationEU J33C22002910001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating health indicators for specific population subgroups is a recurring challenge in epidemiology and public health. When survey data are used, small area estimation (SAE) methods can improve precision by borrowing strength across domains. In many applications, however, outcomes are self-reported and affected by coarsening mechanisms, such as rounding and digit preference, that reduce data resolution and may bias inference. This paper addresses both issues by developing a Bayesian unit-level SAE framework for semi-continuous, coarsened responses. Motivated by the 2019 Italian European Health Interview Survey, we estimate smoking indicators for domains defined by the cross-classification of Italian regions and age groups, capturing both smoking prevalence and intensity. The model adopts a two-part structure: a logistic component for smoking prevalence and a flexible mixture of lognormal distributions for average cigarette consumption, coupled with an explicit model for coarsening and top-coding. Although the parameters governing the heaping mechanism are estimated from the data, its structural specification relies on assumptions about plausible rounding regimes and therefore requires substantive expert judgment. Simulation studies show that ignoring coarsening can yield biased and unstable domain estimates with poor interval coverage, whereas the proposed model improves accuracy and achieves near-nominal coverage. The empirical application provides a detailed picture of smoking patterns across region-age domains, helping to characterize the dynamics of the phenomenon and inform targeted public health policies.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalSmall-Area AnalysisSmokingBayes TheoremComputer SimulationFemaleHealth SurveysHumansItalyPrevalencedigit preferenceheapinglognormal mixture modelself‐reported survey dataunit‐level model

Identifiers

PMID42875961
PMCPMC13669427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.