ArticleNMR in biomedicine2026
Radial Tiny Golden Angle UTE (tyGA-UTE) for Cardiac MRI in the Small Animal Model.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robust cardiorespiratory motion correction is critical for high-quality ultra-high-field (UHF) preclinical cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Whereas radial tiny golden angle (tyGA) sampling, data-driven self-gating (sg), compressed sensing (CS), and ultrashort echo time (UTE) are individually well-established techniques, their integration into a unified acquisition and reconstruction pipeline, together with systematic validation at 11.7 T remains insufficiently explored. This study presents and validates a UHF-optimized tyGA-based UTE workflow that enables high-temporal-resolution sliding-window dynamic imaging (SW-tyGA-UTE) and high-spatial-resolution cardiorespiratory self-gated cine imaging (Gated-tyGA-UTE) from a single continuous acquired tyGA acquisition. All experiments were performed on an 11.7-T small-animal MRI system in 16 healthy wild-type mice. Cardiac functional parameters, image quality metrics (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR] and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]), and inter-/intra-observer reproducibility were systematically compared between the proposed tyGA-UTE pipeline and two navigator-gated reference techniques: retrospectively gated FLASH and UTE methodologies. SW-tyGA-UTE and Gated-tyGA-UTE reconstructions yielded global left ventricular functional parameters comparable to those obtained with the reference methods (all p > 0.05). All functional metrics showed excellent intra-observer (ICC = 0.94-0.99) and inter-observer (ICC = 0.90-0.98) reproducibility, with ejection fraction showing the highest measurement consistency. Image quality was evaluated using an image-based within-ROI noise quantification approach that captures both thermal noise and reconstruction-related artifacts. In this analysis, the Gated-tyGA-UTE protocol showed no statistically significant differences in left ventricular blood-pool SNR, myocardial SNR, or CNR relative to the reference sequences. In contrast, the high-temporal-resolution sliding-window reconstruction showed significantly reduced image quality across all three metrics, consistent with the expected spatiotemporal trade-off of undersampled dynamic imaging. This study validates a robust, UHF-optimized tyGA-UTE imaging workflow that generates both high-fidelity quantitative cine data and ultra-fast dynamic cardiac images from a single acquisition. The unified pipeline eliminates the need for sequential repeated scans, minimizes anesthesia-related physiological variability, and improves experimental efficiency, providing a practical tool for preclinical cardiac phenotyping, longitudinal studies, and drug screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.