ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026
Delineating a Spectrum of Physician Participation in Medical Aid in Dying: A Qualitative Exploration.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhysician participation in medical aid in dying (MAID) is commonly framed as a binary choice between participation and objection. Emerging evidence suggests physician involvement is nuanced, with levels of engagement shaped by ethical beliefs, professional responsibilities, and organizational structure. Improved understanding of how physicians make these decisions is needed to inform policy, clinical practice, and discussions about conscience-based practices.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study of 20 physicians practicing in US states where MAID is legal. We used purposive sampling to recruit typical cases, seeking maximum variation across geographic region, practice specialty, and MAID involvement. Participants completed virtual, semi-structured, in-depth interviews between April and August 2025. Interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Coding was adductive with deductive codes derived from extant literature, focusing on physicians' experiences with MAID, ethical orientations, and interpretations of bioethical principles.
resultsAnalysis identified a spectrum of physician participation classified across four broad categories: (1) discusses MAID only; (2) refers patients to MAID providers, because of ethical opposition or organizational constraints; (3) serves as a consulting provider only; and (4) serves as an attending provider. Although participants referenced the same core bioethical principles, variations in participation reflect differing interpretations of shared ethical principles and the influence of organizational and legal environments.
conclusionsFindings challenge the prevailing dichotomous view of MAID participation and demonstrate that physician engagement exists along a spectrum. Recognizing this spectrum may improve policy development, support clinician decision-making, and foster more nuanced discussions regarding conscience, ethics, and access to MAID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.