ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
Leading by example: a migrant health researcher's journey from participation to epistemic justice and migrant-centred governance in public health research.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Participatory and co-produced approaches are increasingly promoted in migrant health research to improve equity and ensure research reflects community priorities. Despite growing guidance on conducting research with migrants, migrants remain underrepresented in research leadership, governance, agenda-setting, and knowledge production. Drawing on lived experience as both a migrant and public health researcher, this reflective paper examines the evolution of a program of research spanning health and social care integration, public health emergency preparedness, and international collaborations with migrant communities, frontline workers, and researchers. The paper traces a progression from a focus on service responsiveness and integration towards broader questions of participation, power-sharing, and knowledge justice. Findings highlight the importance of sustained relationships, and community partnerships in generating meaningful and actionable evidence. The work demonstrates how recognising migrants as legitimate knowledge holders through shared governance, remuneration, authorship, and leadership roles can strengthen both the quality and relevance of research. These experiences illustrate a shift from consultation and collaboration towards migrant-led approaches to knowledge generation. The next stage of migrant health research should move beyond participation and co-production towards epistemic justice and migrant-centred governance. This requires challenging traditional hierarchies of expertise and recognising migrants not only as research participants but as leaders, agenda-setters, and producers of knowledge. Such approaches offer a pathway towards more equitable, accountable, and responsive public health research, policy, and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.