Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42875769›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Exploring nursing students' communication experiences with artificial intelligence-supported virtual patients: a qualitative study.

Ayşegül Korkmaz Doğdu, Ayşe Dağistan Akgöz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayşegül Korkmaz DoğduFundamentals of Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Akdeniz University, Campus 07070, Konyaaltı, Antalya, Turkey. ayseguldogdu@akdeniz.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1842-3194
Ayşe Dağistan AkgözPublic Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2933-3402

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective communication is essential in nursing, and artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT are increasingly integrated into nursing education.

methodsThis phenomenological study explores how ChatGPT-supported virtual patient scenarios influence nursing students' empathy and communication skills. Third-year nursing students enrolled in a Family Health Nursing elective interacted with a virtual patient through predefined ChatGPT prompts simulating a counseling session. Data were collected through focus group interviews and online reflective diaries.

resultsThematic analysis revealed three themes: "Unrealistic empathy and communication experience", "Solution-oriented and effective communication experience", "Communication and empathy awareness: Future communication strategies and professional preparation"

conclusionsAlthough participants perceived ChatGPT-supported virtual patient communication as providing a less realistic communication and empathy experience than real patient interactions, they also reported that ChatGPT's interaction style offered a structured and solution-oriented communication experience. Furthermore, the ChatGPT-supported virtual patient communication experience was perceived as helping students make reflection and self-assessment about communication and empathy, and identify areas for improvement before interacting with real patients. These findings suggest that ChatGPT-supported virtual patient communication cannot replace real patient encounters, but it can serve as a complementary educational tool that encourages reflective learning and prepares nursing students for subsequent clinical communication experiences.

Indexed as

AI-supported learningChatGPT-supportedCommunicationEmpathyNursing educationVirtual patient

Identifiers

PMID42875769
PMCPMC13670500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.