ArticleBMC public health2026
Rabies and rabies prophylaxis in Egypt: a nationwide cross-sectional study that calls for action.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRabies is a fatal but preventable viral disease that poses a global health threat, especially in developing countries. Despite the high incidence of animal bites reported annually in Egypt, limited data exist regarding the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of the general population toward rabies and rabies prophylaxis.
methodsWe conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study using a structured interview-based survey targeting individuals aged 18 years or older who attended outpatient clinics at nine university hospitals across Egypt. The survey assessed participants' KAP toward rabies and rabies prophylaxis and identified barriers to prophylaxis uptake.
resultsAmong 1,777 participants who responded to the survey, only 42.8% (n = 760) had good knowledge about rabies and rabies prophylaxis, while the majority, 88.5% (n = 1,572), exhibited a positive attitude toward rabies prophylaxis. Knowledge was higher among those who reported awareness of rabies campaigns in their geographic areas (69.1% vs. 40.5%, p < 0.001) and those who had previously been bitten or attacked by animals (56.1% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.001). Overall, 9.7% (n = 173) of participants reported a history of animal bites or attacks; however, 18.5% (n = 32) of these participants did not receive post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and 17% (n = 24) did not complete the vaccine schedule. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake was low, with only 4.3% (n = 23) of high-risk individuals receiving it. Key barriers to rabies prophylaxis included lack of knowledge about the rabies vaccine, reported by 82.4% of participants, lack of knowledge about rabies, reported by 81.7%, and inadequate hospital facilities, reported by 43.1%.
conclusionsDespite a generally positive attitude toward rabies prophylaxis, knowledge and adherence to prophylactic measures, including pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis, remain relatively inadequate in Egypt. Public health interventions, such as educational campaigns and improved accessibility to vaccination services, are needed to address these gaps and mitigate the public health burden of rabies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.