ArticleBMC primary care2026
Point-of-care ultrasound in German general practice: a qualitative study of opportunities and barriers.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternational studies show that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly being used in primary care settings and can improve diagnostic decision-making. Particularly in the field of general practice, which is characterised by a lower prevalence of severe diseases, the use of POCUS may facilitate patient history-taking and diagnosis in a more targeted and efficient manner. This study aims to investigate how German general practitioners (GPs) perceive the clinical benefits, barriers, and implementation of conventional ultrasound use to date, as well as the benefit, barriers, and implementation requirements of POCUS in primary care.
methodsBetween March and June 2023, two focus groups (FGs) were held at each of two locations (in Bavaria and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) as part of general practice quality circles. Using a convenience sample, each of the four FGs included between five and eight GPs. Semi-structured FGs were transcribed and anonymised. Using Mayring's inductive content analysis method, two researchers analysed the FGs. The aim was to develop and identify new hypotheses and unexpected themes shedding light on both perspectives regarding the practical benefit and structural challenges of conventional ultrasound, as well as the potential of and barriers to the use of POCUS in general practice.
resultsFrom the participants' perspective, ultrasound has proven to be extremely relevant in everyday general practice. However, existing reimbursement frameworks and training requirements were perceived as significant barriers. The participants considered the implementation of POCUS in primary care as an opportunity to lower these barriers, improve diagnostic processes, and strengthen GPs' skills.
conclusionOur findings make it clear that the use of ultrasound currently depends largely on the individual commitment of GPs - in terms of the time involved and the financial resources required. However, it is also clear that POCUS could offer the potential to improve the conditions for the use of ultrasound in GP practices. In this way, the introduction of POCUS may improve diagnostic workflows and their accessibility in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.