Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2026
Impact of ophthalmic draping on end-tidal CO₂, cerebral oximetry, and optic nerve sheath diameter in cataract surgery: an observational comparison by COVID-19 pneumonia history with randomized oxygen flow allocation.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05571683 (Comparison of Cerebral Oxymeter and End Tidal Carbondioxide Values Under Surgical Drapes in Patients With and Without Past COVID-19 Infection Undergoing Cataract Operation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Cerebral Oxymeter and End Tidal Carbondioxide Values Under Surgical Drapes in Patients With and Without Past COVID-19 Infection Undergoing Cataract Operation
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOphthalmic draping during cataract surgery creates an isolated surgical field but may lead to carbon dioxide (CO₂) accumulation beneath the drape. Elevated CO₂ can cause hypercapnia, cerebral vasodilation, and increased intracranial pressure, potentially reflected by changes in cerebral oximetry and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). Patients with a history of COVID-19 pneumonia may exhibit residual pulmonary dysfunction that influences these parameters during surgery. This study aimed to investigate the effects of ophthalmic draping on end-tidal CO₂, cerebral oximetry, and ONSD in patients undergoing cataract surgery and to determine whether these effects differ between patients with and without a history of COVID-19 pneumonia.
methodsThis prospective comparative study included 80 ASA I-III patients aged > 18 years with and without a history of COVID-19 pneumonia who underwent unilateral phacoemulsification under local anesthesia. Participants were divided into two main groups: those with (Group A, n = 40) and without (Group B, n = 40) a history of COVID-19 pneumonia. Within each predefined COVID-19 history stratum, patients were randomly allocated by block randomization to receive either 2 L/min (A-2, B-2) or 4 L/min (A-4, B-4) oxygen insufflation beneath the surgical drape. End-tidal CO₂ and hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored, while cerebral oximetry parameters (rSO₂, ΔO₂Hb, ΔHHb, ΔcHb) were measured bilaterally every five minutes. ONSD was assessed ultrasonographically before and after surgery.
resultsETCO₂ values showed no significant group-by-time differences. Postoperative ONSD values were significantly higher than preoperative values within both main groups and all oxygen-flow subgroups; however, the between-group comparisons were not statistically significant. Right frontal relative deoxyhemoglobin changes (ΔHHb-right) differed significantly between Groups A and B at the 10th minute (p = 0.003), while the other cerebral oximetry parameters demonstrated no significant group- or time-dependent differences. No patient developed hypoxia or neurological deterioration.
conclusionsIn patients undergoing short-duration unilateral phacoemulsification under local anesthesia with supplemental oxygen at 2-4 L/min, ophthalmic draping was not associated with clinically meaningful differences in ETCO₂ or ONSD, regardless of the history of COVID-19 pneumonia. Although selected cerebral oximetry parameters showed statistically significant differences between groups, all measured respiratory, hemodynamic, and cerebral physiological variables remained within physiological limits throughout the procedure. These findings should be interpreted within the context of the specific clinical settings studied.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05571683. Retrospectively registered on 7 October 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.