ArticleBehavior research methods2026
The samplr package: A tool for modeling human cognition with sampling algorithms.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many models of cognition have sampling as a central component. Researchers have used them to explain human performance across a wide range of tasks involving perception, probability reasoning, and choice. One family of these models takes inspiration from sampling approaches developed in statistics, either by adjusting samples with prior beliefs or by implementing a sampling algorithm that overcomes the difficulty of independent samples at the expense of autocorrelation. While these models have been successful in modeling human behavior, their adoption has been slowed by the technical difficulties in applying them. Here, we introduce the samplr package, which includes a variety of these algorithms and cognitive models built upon them. We show how models in this package can match qualitative patterns found in human data, and walk readers through examples of how to compare these models quantitatively to human data. This tool aims to make these methods accessible to many more researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.