ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Habitat Radiomics and Machine Learning for Preoperative Three-class Classification of Pediatric Acute Appendicitis: A Dual-center Study with External Validation.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate preoperative differentiation of pediatric acute appendicitis subtypes is relevant to treatment planning. We developed and externally validated a machine-learning framework combining habitat-based computed tomography (CT) radiomics with clinical variables for three-class classification (simple, complex, and appendiceal abscess). This retrospective dual-center study included 317 children undergoing appendectomy at Institution A (training n = 222, internal validation n = 95) and 174 children at Institution B (external validation). K-means + + habitat segmentation (k = 3) of preoperative noncontrast CT volumes of interest yielded 1218 radiomic features; ten features selected on the training cohort were combined with 20 preoperative clinical variables. Eight classifiers were compared using macro-averaged one-versus-rest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, and macro-F1, with bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs), DeLong tests, calibration statistics, and decision curve analysis. In external validation, naive Bayes achieved the highest macro-AUC (0.946, 95% CI 0.910-0.974), accuracy 0.776 (0.713-0.833), and macro-F1 0.766 (0.674-0.837), significantly exceeding all seven comparators among the configurations evaluated (p < 0.001); the internal validation macro-AUC was 0.940 (0.893-0.977). Per-class external AUCs were 0.920 (simple), 0.948 (complex), and 0.971 (abscess). Calibration slopes (0.23-0.30) indicated that probability outputs require recalibration before probabilistic use. In a five-arm ablation of the input feature blocks, the fusion model combining clinical variables with habitat radiomics performed best (external macro-AUC 0.971), ahead of habitat radiomics alone (0.952), clinical variables plus conventional whole-VOI radiomics (0.776), clinical variables alone (0.763) and conventional whole-VOI radiomics alone (0.582). Habitat radiomics combined with machine learning provided accurate, externally validated three-class classification of pediatric acute appendicitis in children undergoing appendectomy. Naive Bayes offered the most balanced subtype discrimination. The model is a subtype-stratification aid rather than a stand-alone diagnostic or treatment-selection tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42875693What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.