ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Reliability and Reproducibility of a Novel MRI-Based Classification System for Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: A Comparative Study with the Pfirrmann Classification.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a novel eight-grade MRI-based classification system for lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration and fix it as describe its reproducibility relative to the five-grade Pfirrmann classification. In this retrospective single-center reliability study, 250 consecutive adults undergoing lumbar MRI between May 2025 and May 2026 were included, providing 1250 intervertebral discs from L1-L2 through L5-S1. Four blinded observers with different levels of musculoskeletal and spine imaging experience independently graded all discs using both classification systems. All assessments were repeated after a 3-week washout period with randomized image order. Overall interobserver agreement was assessed using quadratically weighted Gwet's AC2 and intraobserver agreement using quadratically weighted Cohen's kappa. Confidence intervals were calculated using patient-level cluster bootstrap resampling. Each classification generated 5000 grading assessments. At the initial assessment, interobserver Gwet's AC2 was 0.767 (95% CI 0.756-0.779) for the novel classification and 0.817 (95% CI 0.808-0.826) for Pfirrmann. Intraobserver weighted kappa ranged from 0.436 to 0.810 for the novel classification and from 0.507 to 0.833 for Pfirrmann. The novel eight-grade classification showed reproducible grading in this cohort, although its interobserver agreement was numerically lower than that of Pfirrmann and intraobserver agreement varied across readers. These findings do not establish clinical validity or statistical equivalence between the systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42875688What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.