ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Three-dimensional anatomical classification and machine learning prediction of the P6a-right hepatic vein relationship: surgical implications for laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe spatial relationship between the ventral branch of segment VI portal vein (P6a) and the right hepatic vein (RHV) significantly influences the anatomical complexity of the right hepatic fissure and the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy (LRAS). The ventral-P6a variant is often associated with higher surgical risks, yet preoperative prediction remains challenging.
methodsThis retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent triple-phase enhanced CT of the upper abdomen. Based on three-dimensional reconstructions, P6a was classified as dorsal or ventral relative to the RHV according to its anatomical relationship. Five machine learning models-logistic regression, random forest, K-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, and XGBoost-were employed to predict P6a classification using anatomical angular and linear measurements. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the F1-score, and the SHAP method was applied for feature interpretation.
resultsAmong the 100 patients, 59% were classified as dorsal-P6a and 41% as ventral-P6a. The ventral-P6a group exhibited a significantly smaller angle between the anterior and posterior portal branches (82.27° vs. 98.02°, P = 0.003), a higher proportion with a distance of less than 5 mm from the P6a origin to the posterior branch origin (37% vs. 10%, P = 0.001), and a larger RHV-inferior vena cava angle (52.23° vs. 43.97°, P = 0.013). The logistic regression model demonstrated the best performance in the test set (F1-score = 0.741) with minimal overfitting. The most important predictive features included the angle between the anterior and posterior portal branches, the angle of the right hepatic fissure plane, and the diameter of P6a. SHAP analysis validated the interpretability of the model.
conclusionA machine learning model based on three-dimensional imaging anatomical features can effectively predict the spatial classification of P6a relative to the RHV. The interpretable logistic regression model identifies key anatomical risk factors, providing a basis for preoperative risk assessment and surgical planning in LRAS, particularly for optimizing surgical strategies in high-risk patients with the ventral-P6a variant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42875673What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.