Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42875670›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Boundary memory and image memorability are systematically related.

Yongseong Lee, Su Keun Jeong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yongseong LeeCognitive Science Research Group, Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Su Keun JeongDepartment of Psychology, The Catholic University of Korea, 43 Jibong-ro, Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. skj@catholic.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3548-6920

Funding

Catholic University of Korea 2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boundary extension refers to the tendency to remember scenes as having wider boundaries than were physically present. A separate line of research has shown that image memorability, defined as the likelihood that an image will be remembered across observers, varies substantially across images. Previous research suggests that both boundary extension and image memorability heavily depend on image characteristics, yet the possibility that the two phenomena are related has not been directly tested. In the current study, we asked whether images that produce stronger boundary extension also tend to be more memorable. First, we compared boundary transformation scores from an existing dataset with memorability estimates generated by a deep-learning model. Results revealed that images showing greater boundary extension tended to have higher predicted memorability. Next, we conducted behavioral experiments measuring boundary memory for scene images and directly assessed recognition memory for the same images. Consistent with the first analysis, images associated with greater boundary extension showed higher memorability. Finally, analyses of experimentally manipulated stimuli showed that image manipulations known to increase boundary extension also increased predicted memorability. Taken together, these findings reveal a systematic relationship between boundary memory and memorability, suggesting that shared image properties may influence both the tendency to extend scene boundaries and the strength of memory encoding.

Indexed as

MemoryPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyHumansBoundary extensionBoundary memoryMemorabilityScene property

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.