ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Volumetric discordance between ¹⁸F-FET-PET/MRI and MRI-based radiotherapy target volumes in high-grade glioma: a prospective pilot study (FETSMaRT).
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06499831 (18F-FET-PET/MRI Versus Standard MRI Alone for Stereotactic RadioTherapy Planning for High Grade Brain Gliomas), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
18F-FET-PET/MRI Versus Standard MRI Alone for Stereotactic RadioTherapy Planning for High Grade Brain Gliomas: A Pilot Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHigh-grade gliomas carry a poor prognosis, and MRI-based radiotherapy (RT) planning may inadequately capture metabolically active tumor infiltration. ¹⁸F-fluoroethyl-tyrosine (FET) PET provides superior tumor delineation, yet prospective North American evidence supporting integration with RT planning remains limited.
methodsFETSMaRT enrolled 30 patients with WHO grade 3 or 4 high-grade glioma receiving post-operative RT. FET-PET/MRI was acquired before RT with the radiation oncologist blinded to PET, enabling retrospective quantification of discordance between MRI-based and FET-PET/MRI-derived gross tumor (GTV), clinical target (CTV), and planning target (PTV) volumes. In the glioblastoma subgroup (n = 23), Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses related GTV and CTV discordance to time to progression.
resultsMedian age was 60 years; 77% had glioblastoma and 60% MGMT promoter methylation. GTV discordance occurred in 17/30 patients (56.7%) and CTV discordance in 15/30 (50.0%). FET-PET/MRI-derived volumes significantly exceeded MRI-based volumes for GTV (43.6 vs. 38.6 cc; p < 0.0001), CTV (119.2 vs. 110.8 cc; p = 0.0045), and PTV (171.1 vs. 159.6 cc; p = 0.0003). Larger GTV∆ and CTV∆ change values were associated with numerically shorter median time to progression, but neither association was statistically significant. Radiation treatment failures were predominantly central (60.0%).
conclusionFET-PET/MRI-derived target volumes were significantly larger than MRI-based volumes, confirming systematic underestimation of metabolically active tumor extent by anatomical MRI. While not meeting significance in this pilot study, directional CTV and GTV discordance suggests a possible association with progression; the hypothesis generating exploratory pilot data nonetheless justify a prospective trial of FET-PET-guided RT in high-grade glioma. NCT06499831.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42875659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.