ReviewSurgical endoscopy2026
Efficacy of prophylactic hemoclip placement for preventing delayed post-polypectomy bleeding in nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsEvidence regarding prophylactic hemoclip (HC) for preventing delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) remains inconsistent. This meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) aimed to evaluate HC after thermal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps.
methodsMEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through 28 July 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HC with non-HC after thermal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥ 5 mm. The primary outcome was DPPB. Secondary outcomes included DPPB for proximal large (≥ 20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs), other adverse events, and procedure time. Random-effects models, subgroup analyses, GRADE, and TSA were applied.
resultsTen RCTs involving 4,588 patients were included. HC reduced DPPB overall (3.4 vs. 6.5%; RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.34-0.76; P < 0.001; I
conclusionsProphylactic HC closure reduces DPPB after thermal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥ 5 mm, including proximal LNPCPs. Clinical use should consider lesion characteristics, procedural factors, and individualized bleeding risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42875632What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.