ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
MRI-based preoperative WHO grade prediction in meningioma: development and comparison of deep learning, radiomics, clinical, and combined models in multicenter data.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study was to develop and externally validate complementary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based models and their stacked combinations for preoperative World Health Organization (WHO) grading of intracranial meningioma.
methodsThis retrospective multicenter study included 455 histopathologically confirmed meningiomas: a four-center development cohort (n = 346) with leave-one-center-out cross-validation and an external cohort (n = 109). Four base models used contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI: tumor + peritumoral radiomics, an nnU-Net segmentation-based classifier, frozen DINOv3 transfer-learning features, and clinical variables. All 15 combinations were prespecified and stacked using a linear meta-learner trained on development out-of-fold predictions. Frozen models were externally evaluated without modification.
resultsWHO 2-3 tumors comprised 24.6% overall (112/455; development 20.5%; external 37.6%). External AUCs were 0.732 for nnU-Net, 0.703 for DINOv3, 0.645 for clinical, 0.628 for radiomics. The multimodal ensemble (nnU-Net+DINOv3+Clinical) achieved the highest external AUC (0.742), exceeding radiomics (ΔAUC +0.114, p = 0.008) but not nnU-Net (ΔAUC +0.011, p = 0.737). Compared with the clinical model, discrimination was higher but nonsignificant at the prespecified threshold (ΔAUC +0.098, p = 0.050), while reclassification improved (IDI +0.109, p < 0.001). Radiomics-containing combinations performed strongly in development but lost most discrimination externally. The multimodal ensemble had an external calibration slope of 1.32 (Brier 0.190) and net benefit above default strategies at thresholds ≥ 0.23.
conclusionThe multimodal ensemble achieved the highest external AUC but did not significantly exceed nnU-Net, which was the most transportable single predictor of meningioma grade. Clinical variables did not improve discrimination but enabled interpretable feature-level attribution. Handcrafted radiomics lacked external transportability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.