ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Critical Appraisal: Anesthetic Management and Perioperative Predictors of Outcomes in Combined Body Contouring Procedures.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This letter discusses the paper authored by Sahin et al. titled "Anesthetic Management and Perioperative Risk Factors in Combined Body Contouring Procedures: Brazilian Butt Lift, Liposuction and Abdominoplasty." Notable strengths include the large cohort (n = 1120) and the standardized protocols, as well as the low complication rate (0.8%). Noteworthy weaknesses include methodological concerns, which limit the conclusions. The selection bias of the retrospective design and ASA I-II classification compared with data from national datasets reporting higher morbidity are limitations. Because of its multiplicity of predictors and the few number of events, there are concerns of overfitting in the multivariable model. There is also residual confounding between groups, and the binary "prior surgery" variable does not differentiate high-risk post-bariatric patients. There was no uniformity in outcomes reported, no follow-up, and no patient-reported outcomes. Claims that combined procedures seem safe should be cautious; findings are hypothesis generating. Future studies should focus on prospective multicenter study, bariatric surgery subgroups analysis, validated prediction modeling, and patient-centered outcomes.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42875610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.