Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42875604›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Not that cloze: Sentence constraint is influenced by language and language dominance.

Ana Bautista, Clara D Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ana BautistaBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain & Language, Paseo Mikeletegi 69, 20009, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain. a.bautista@bcbl.eu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2557-8338
Clara D MartinBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain & Language, Paseo Mikeletegi 69, 20009, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-5045

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the fields of language processing and prediction, cloze tests are used to establish sentence constraint norms. The validity of cloze test results depends heavily on how closely the pre-test population matches the main study population, and yet there is limited evidence on how sociolinguistic variables may influence sentence constraint. Here, we investigate how language and language dominance influence sentence constraint at the lexical level by conducting a cloze test across different language groups and comparing response entropy. In Analysis 1, sentence constraint was similarly high for Spanish- and French-dominant speakers tested on the same translated sentences. However, their item-by-item alignment was moderate. In Analysis 2, non-dominant French speakers showed lower sentence constraint than dominant speakers overall. Dominant and non-dominant French speakers showed only moderate alignment, whereas the strongest alignment was observed between the two groups of non-dominant French speakers with different dominant languages. Our findings suggest that sentence expectations are shaped by language and language dominance. These findings are discussed considering theoretical proposals on the cloze test procedure, and offer informed practices for designing future language prediction studies across diverse speaker populations.

Indexed as

ComprehensionLanguageMultilingualismPsycholinguisticsAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBilingualismCloze testCross-linguistic differencesPredictionSentence constraint

Identifiers

PMID42875604
PMCPMC13669023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.