ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2026
Alternative splicing fine-tunes modular protein interfaces to control protein localization.
Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alternative splicing provides a pervasive means to expand proteome complexity, yet how it reorganizes protein interactions and cellular localization remains unclear. Here, we show that tissue-regulated longer exons preferably reshape local interaction patterns, whereas microexons fine-tune key interfaces linking distinct cellular processes. Integration of subcellular localization data further indicates that such rewiring can redistribute proteins within cells. By using a high-content imaging approach to systematically evaluate the influence of individual exons on protein localization, we show that 38% of the tested isoform pairs alter localization, with microexons, albeit typically shorter than five amino acids, accounting for a substantial proportion of these effects. Bioinformatic and structural analyses demonstrate that microexons can extend secondary structural regions and reposition charged residues, suggesting a potential to modulate local electrostatic environments. Consistent with this, biochemical analysis of a 4-aa microexon in sorting nexin 2, identified in our screen, confirms that residue insertion rather than side-chain chemistry drives key differences in protein localization through repositioning of a flanking, charged residue. Together, these findings suggest that tissue-regulated alternative splicing fine-tunes interface architecture, thus regulating protein assembly, localization and proteome organization.
Identifiers
42875551What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.