Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42875514›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2026

Symmetries and continuous attractors in disordered neural circuits.

David G Clark, L F Abbott, Haim Sompolinsky

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David G ClarkZuckerman Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. dclark@flatironinstitute.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2397-6992
L F AbbottZuckerman Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1163-5688
Haim SompolinskyKempner Institute for the Study of Natural and Artificial Intelligence, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0322-0629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A core challenge in neuroscience is reconciling idealized models with experimental data. Classical continuous-attractor models describe neural representations of continuous variables such as head direction. Symmetry in the weights generates a manifold of stable states, with tuning curves identical up to shifts. Rodent head-direction cells, by contrast, are markedly heterogeneous. Such heterogeneity, we show, is nevertheless compatible with these models. Here we build, directly from head-direction cell data, recurrent networks that behave as quasicontinuous attractors. A generative process then reproduces the heterogeneous tuning of these cells while making connectivity and dynamics tractable at large N. Although the weights appear disordered, they carry a circular symmetry whose eigenvalue degeneracies could signify continuous-attractor organization in connectome data. Dynamical mean-field theory recovers the ingredients of classical ring attractors, namely, Mexican hat interactions and a spontaneously broken symmetry producing bump states. Continuous-attractor mechanisms may thus operate in complex mammalian circuits.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.