ArticleNature communications2026
Deciphering the mechanisms of macrophage polarization through comprehensive analysis of cellular and cell-surface protein glycosylation.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Targeting tumor-associated macrophages holds great promise for cancer immunotherapy. Surface glycoproteins in macrophages regulate their interactions with tumor cells and represent emerging therapeutic targets. Given the importance of glycoproteins in immunity and cancer, we systematically investigate the total and surface glycoproteomes in polarized macrophages using multiplexed proteomics coupled with selective enrichment. In monocyte-derived macrophages, distinct changes of N-glycoproteins are observed between M1 and M2 phenotypes, with more pronounced alterations in pro-inflammatory M1. In M1, glycoproteins involved in chondroitin sulfate-type glycosaminoglycan (CS-GAG) biosynthesis are upregulated, validated by the elevated CS-GAG levels, and enzymes associated with nucleotide sugar biosynthesis are also upregulated, consistent with the increased hexokinase activity. Furthermore, surface glycoproteomic analysis of primary human macrophages with M1 or M2 phenotype (HM1 and HM2) reveals phenotype-specific remodeling: HM1 display enhanced innate immune signaling, whereas surface glycoproteins related to adhesion and endocytosis are upregulated in HM2. Integrative analyses of cell-surface glycoproteomic, transcriptomic, and tissue-specific datasets enable prioritization of candidate surface proteins associated with M2 phenotype, including LIPA, CD200R1, and CR1, and phenotype-specific changes of several surface glycoproteins are validated by immunofluorescence imaging. Together, this study provides insights into macrophage functional specialization and advances our understanding of cell-surface glycoproteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.